Opinion
Related Photos
-
Marc McGeehan
Discussion
Suddenly, dissent is no longer quite so patriotic
What a difference an inauguration makes. It was only a few months ago that “dissent is the highest form of patriotism” was still the rage among the elite, liberal, “tolerant” class.
But then Barack Obama became president. And now, suddenly, dissenters are paranoid, violent extremists worthy of surveillance by the federal Department of Homeland Security. Returning war veterans, who tend to be conservative and believe that terrorists ought to be called terrorists, need to be watched.
Average working Americans who held polite “Tea Party” protests on April 15 against confiscatory taxes and rampant government spending – protests marked by a lack of broken windows, overturned cars, torched buildings and injuries – are mocked with a not-so-veiled reference to a gay sex act. Conservative television and radio commentators are not only crazed nutcases, they are dangerous purveyors of hate and violence, unlike the civil, issue-oriented discourse of Keith Olbermann and Bill Maher.
Suddenly, there is no tolerance for dissent. It is tantamount to treason.
It was only a few months ago that blocking every element of President Bush’s agenda was tops on the elites’ list of good things to do. Wanting him to fail was a very good thing, whether it was his effort to stabilize Social Security by giving individuals more responsibility and control of it or winning a war. It didn’t matter if the Democrats didn’t have a constructive alternative. Blocking Bush was enough – the highest form of political responsibility.
Then Obama became president. And suddenly any opposition to the president’s agenda is not worthy of substantive debate or discussion. It is simply a very bad thing, to be dismissed with a label: The Party of ‘No.’ Wanting his vast expansion of government authority and spending to fail is hateful and divisive.
It was only a few months ago that the only way to have any street cred as an elite was to throw something like “BushHitler” into your conversation. Even better was to call the president an idiot, insane, incompetent and/or a swaggering cowboy.
Then Obama became president. Suddenly, “swagga” is a very cool thing. What is not cool is to suggest that the president’s agenda is leading us on a path to socialism. Or to suggest that he may not be as brilliant as the adoring press makes him out to be, since he can’t seem to go anywhere or say much of anything without a teleprompter. Those are ugly political smears. Not cool at all.
It was a few years ago, when President Bush was nominating a justice for the Supreme Court, that I heard frenzied liberal elites on National Public Radio warning of the horror of one party holding the presidency and a majority in Congress, and therefore being able to appoint justices to the Supreme Court. It was all so unfair, they wailed.
Then the Democrats took Congress. Then Obama got elected. And now there are no wails of anguish, only celebration among the elites, at the prospect of one party controlling all three branches of government.
Only a few months ago, if a presidential 747 airliner had buzzed Manhattan for a photo shoot, coming within 1,500 feet of some of the buildings, there would have been a media feeding frenzy for the blood of President Bush. The words “arrogant” and “jerk” would have been the gentler labels. The story would have played for weeks, minimum. There is no way the press would have stood by meekly while the White House issued a perfunctory apology, prodded a single aide to fall on his sword, refused to say who was on the plane or released only one of the photos – shot for publicity purposes.
But Obama is the president. So while there was a flurry of criticism from those quickly labeled the “right-wing hate machine,” it was a one- or two-day story at most for the mainstream media. Move along. Nothing to see here. Have you heard how fantastically the administration has been handling the swine – uh, I mean the H1N1 – flu crisis?
Until a few months ago, any elite conversation about President Bush had to include a standard line about him “shredding the Constitution.”
But now Obama is president. And when asked what standard he will apply when nominating a successor to retiring Supreme Court Justice David Souter, the president said he wanted someone who “understands that justice isn’t about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a casebook; it is also about how our laws affect the daily reality of people’s lives, whether they can make a living and care for their families, whether they feel safe in their homes and welcome in their own nation.”
Not a word about how judges are supposed to be blind to personal circumstance. Not a word about the Constitution. I guess we won’t have to worry about the administration or the court shredding the Constitution, because there is no Constitution to shred.
It is fine, when a new president takes office, for the agenda to change, and reflect the philosophy of his party. Not so fine for the standards and rules for judging an administration to take a 180-degree turn.
Not the kind of change I’m believing in.
Taylor Armerding writes for The Eagle-Tribune in North Andover, Mass.
- Opinion
-
-
Family unit is not complete without a father
In today’s society, and to its detriment, more and more fathers are being viewed as an optional part of the family unit. But in reality, as the father goes, so goes the family.
Seldom, if ever, do I give much credence to what celebrities think or say.
Most of them don’t live anywhere near the real world you and I live in, and, most of the time, they pontificate on things for which they have absolutely zero experience. -
Whatever happened to that quaint relic called civility?
CAN WE BE candid here? Can we just say this plainly?
The public is a bunch of rude, obnoxious jerks.
OK, so I overstate. A little. Yes, there are exceptions. I’m not such a bad guy and you, of course, are a paragon of civility. But the rest of them? A cavalcade of boors, boobs, bums, bozos, and troglodytes. -
Government’s action is the ‘obesity’ problem
You will be shocked--shocked--to hear that we have an obesity problem in America.
You needed the government to tell you, since you never would have noticed by walking down the street, going to a ball game, hanging out in a bar or going shopping.
Obesity is, uh, growing, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control... -
Your View: Letters to the Editor, Aug. 11, 2010
Two Slippery Rock area residents discuss a letter township supervisors sent out to residents, in which they express their opinions about a proposed merger between Slippery Rock Borough and Slippery Rock Township.
-
When idiocy sets the tone of public policy
I don’t spend much time watching those 24-hour news channels.
That’s because they don’t have enough real news to fill the air time. So they either resort to repetition or punditry as filler.
I spend even less time reading political blogs on the Internet. Most of the material is stolen from other sources. And this particular breed of blogger tends to see the entire world through some sort of ideological prism. -
When they dropped the bomb - Remembering August 1945
This week marks 65 years since the United States dropped the atomic bomb. On Aug. 6, 1945, President Harry Truman delivered a “rain of ruin” upon Hiroshima, Japan, with Nagasaki hit three days later, killing 100,000 to 200,000.
-
Councilman: ‘Get the facts’ about possible SR merger
A number of recent newspaper articles and a June 2010 letter distributed to Slippery Rock Township residents from Slippery Rock Township supervisors cite opinion regarding several community issues. Since I am mentioned in the letter and a number of the articles. I feel compelled to respond to the Slippery Rock merger/consolidation issue since space limits a response to all issues.
-
Your View: Letters to the Editor, July 24, 2010
A Grove City woman thanks Grove City Little Eagles Football Boosters for their conservation effort, while a Slippery Rock Township resident adds her two cents regarding a possible study that would determine whether or not a merger of the township and Slippery Rock Borough is a good idea.
-
Your View: Letters to the Editor
An 11-year-old Grove City girl shares her thoughts on Congress and the responsibility of government leaders, while a Grove City man thinks Olde Town could use more green space.
-
The thin culture: Hoping for good news from Cathy
My favorite section of the paper is still the comics. Lately I have been reading what seems to have become an annual theme in the “Cathy” comic strip. Not only can Cathy not find a suitable bathing suit, she is repulsed by the sight of her body in the suits she tries on. Cathy’s obsession with her outward appearance often keeps her from enjoying life. This otherwise successful person suffers from insecurity and low self-esteem because she is not thin.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
