The (Shamokin) News-Item
U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter’s abrupt switch of parties should not be viewed as a win for Democrats or a loss for Republicans. It’s a loss for all of us.
While an accomplished leader and quality human being, Specter, like many today in Washington and Harrisburg, is so ingrained in the process of politics that he’d do anything — without shame — to win re-election.
At 79 years old, survivor of several battles with cancer, and after nearly 30 years in the U.S. Senate, Specter, under challenge for the Republican nomination in the 2010 primary election, could have recognized that his time had come, that he should bow out gracefully. Instead, he was guided by, what, ego? Greed? The promise of money and support from President Obama and the Democrats? No matter the answer, it had nothing to do with legislation, or with the common constituent that he is sworn to serve.
The argument continues to be made that veteran legislators are valuable because they know the issues, they know the people, the process and the politics, knowledge that a rookie lawmaker would take years to acquire. More and more, however, that argument is exactly why we DO need term limits. Those who serve for decades on end begin to believe they are larger than the system itself, and, with that, spending and bureaucracy simply grow further out of control.
Suburban Philadelphia resident Joe Torsella, the only declared Democratic candidate for Specter’s seat, may have said it best in his reaction to the news of Specter’s switch: “I believe we need new leadership, new ideas and new approaches in Washington ... Nothing about today’s news regarding Sen. Specter changes that.”
The Associated Press
Opinion
Editorial: Specter’s switch suggests it’s time for term limits
- Opinion
-
-
The GOP: Party in Flux
With Rick Santorum having dropped out of the race, Mitt Romney is apparently the Republican nominee for POTUS, barring a "black swan" event swooping down out of nowhere.
-
We must be smart when crafting the next Farm Bill
There is broad agreement that the next Farm Bill will contain substantial cuts, but there are wide disagreements on how the important legislation should be crafted.
-
Obama, the Russians and the missile defense
President Obama has caused quite a stir with a private comment made to Russian President Dimitri Medvedev.
-
Kudos to the League, 40, for taking high, civil road
In a political climate many describe as poisonous, where knee-jerk reactions and partisan sniping are the rule, we'd like to take a moment to highlight an exceptional organization that defies those trends.
-
U.S. has long needed a long-term energy policy
Many of the immediate and seemingly intractable problems that make headlines in America are not readily solvable by the federal government.
-
Tragic drowning won't be in vain, thanks to efforts
Many of us were saddened recently by the tragic story of the puppy Callahan, who drowned in the Shenango River Lake after falling through thin ice.
-
Voter fraud 'solution' seems designed to disenfranchise
It's pretty rare when there's anything in my inbox about state Sen. Bob Robbins, so when an email popped up last Thursday with the Salem Township Republican's name in the subject line, I was intrigued.
- Greatest president has help from obscure relative
-
Sorry mess: Presidential apologies and pardons
Much ink has flowed over the recent apologies from President Barack Obama, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and General John Allen, commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, following the burning of copies of the Koran and their careless disposal. An apology may have been justified. A national mea culpa was not.
-
Any real budget work may come after election
The good news of President Obama's proposed 2013 budget: It increases spending only 0.2 percent. The bad news: There is no reform for long-term fiscal problems like Medicare.
- More Opinion Headlines
-
The GOP: Party in Flux


