Opinion
Related Photos
Discussion
Fidel’s a madman – but what excuse have his followers?
“Learn what the new Cuba offers its people – and its neighbors. To its people, peace, democracy, prosperity. To its neighbors, friendship, and the cooperation of men who respect each other...” – Daily Worker, Dec. 13, 1959
Unfortunately, I was standing – not sitting – when I glanced at a periodical rack that displayed the latest issue of “FP” – Foreign Policy magazine. The question emblazoned across the cover should have been preceded by a warning to readers to sit before they read further. Instead, the innocent were accosted by this headline: “Was Fidel Good for Cuba?”
Foreign Policy is published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a prestigious, left-leaning and at times thoughtful foreign-policy voice in Washington. It is rarely noted by the likewise left-leaning Washington establishment that the Carnegie Endowment was once headed by Alger Hiss, the communist spy who served the USSR during Stalin’s Red Terror. The sophisticated set in Washington considers it inappropriate, impolite, and, of course, a form of McCarthyism, to make reference to this inconvenient fact concerning the endowment.
Yet, as I stood speechless at this inconceivable thought on the cover of FP, I couldn’t help but think of Hiss. I had an eerie feeling that Alger’s ghost was back at the endowment running its publications, maybe with his wife and partner Priscilla again behind the typewriter. Worse, much like a motorist passing a car wreck, I couldn’t help but open the pages to peer at the carnage inside.
To be fair, FP aims to be unpredictable and to challenge its readers, and this question was posed in a debate format with differing perspectives, plus an accompanying online forum, where, amazingly, 77 percent of the periodical’s respondents surmised that, yes, Fidel was good for Cuba. Indeed, Alger’s presence lingers.
Here’s the reality: Whether Fidel was good for Cuba is not a matter of debate, even if FP scares up the usual suspects to pay homage to the dictator’s personal trinity of “free” healthcare, collectivism and wealth redistribution.
Fidel’s failures are too numerous to recount, beginning with his 48-year postponement of elections or the tens of thousands of murdered victims or the countless dead at sea who tried to escape from an island prison forced to ban boats. Of course, the best evidence for resolving the debate would be a simple poll of everyday Cubans – if only such polls were permitted.
That said, the single most significant factor that should forever put to rest this absurd question is one that always get ignored by Castro’s sympathizers: If Fidel Castro would have had his way in October 1962, Cuba would literally cease to exist. This is not an exaggeration. The fact is that Fidel actually recommended to Soviet General Secretary Nikita Khrushchev that Cuba and the USSR together launch an all-out nuclear attack upon the United States during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and even urged Khrushchev to do so if U.S. troops invaded the island.
This is no secret. Castro has openly admitted it many times. Robert McNamara, President John F. Kennedy’s secretary of defense during the Cuban Missile Crisis, was taken aback by Castro’s candor when the two men discussed the incident years later. Fidel told him flatly, “Bob, I did recommend they (the nuclear missiles) were to be used.”
In total, there were 162 Soviet missiles on the island. That, however, was not the sum total of missiles that would have been subsequently launched. The United States in turn would have launched on Cuba, and also on the USSR. President Kennedy made that clear commitment in his nationally televised speech on Oct. 22, 1962:
“It shall be the policy of this nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union.”
In response, of course, the Soviets would have launched on America from Soviet soil. Even then, the fireworks would just be starting: Under the terms of their NATO and Warsaw Pact charters, the nations of Western and Eastern Europe would also start firing.
Once the smoke cleared, there would be hundreds of millions and possibly even over a billion dead, with Western civilization in its death throes. If Fidel Castro had his way, he would have precipitated the greatest slaughter in human history.
Would that have been good for Cuba?
Fidel has weighed in on that one, stating the obvious to McNamara: “What would have happened to Cuba? It would have been totally destroyed.”
Fidel didn’t care, and neither did his comrade Che Guevara, a cult hero to Hollywood and to college students brainwashed in anti-Americanism. Fidel and Che were ready for martyrdom, with Cuba serving as the eternal triumphant symbol of the glorious fight against capitalism and American imperialism. As McNamara said of Fidel, “He would have pulled the temple down on his head.”
Even the Soviets were stunned. Nikita Khrushchev quickly realized he was dealing with a lunatic and better immediately bring the missiles home.
Fidel Castro has been a madman and a menace for a long, long time. What explains his defenders? Why do they continue to defend the indefensible?
Paul Kengor is author of “The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism” (HarperCollins, 2006), professor of political science, and executive director of the Center for Vision & Values at Grove City College.
- Opinion
-
-
Your View: Letters to the Editor, July 24, 2010
A Grove City woman thanks Grove City Little Eagles Football Boosters for their conservation effort, while a Slippery Rock Township resident adds her two cents regarding a possible study that would determine whether or not a merger of the township and Slippery Rock Borough is a good idea.
-
Your View: Letters to the Editor
An 11-year-old Grove City girl shares her thoughts on Congress and the responsibility of government leaders, while a Grove City man thinks Olde Town could use more green space.
-
The thin culture: Hoping for good news from Cathy
My favorite section of the paper is still the comics. Lately I have been reading what seems to have become an annual theme in the “Cathy” comic strip. Not only can Cathy not find a suitable bathing suit, she is repulsed by the sight of her body in the suits she tries on. Cathy’s obsession with her outward appearance often keeps her from enjoying life. This otherwise successful person suffers from insecurity and low self-esteem because she is not thin.
-
Want to read your own viewpoint? Write it down
Several people have approached me in recent months to voice their opinions about local issues or one of the various op-ed pieces I’ve selected for publication.
On one hand, this is fantastic. I’m thrilled to know that people care about the many issues going on locally, nationally and globally, and that they care enough to say they agree or disagree (as mainly happens) with something published on this page.
On the other hand, it is lamentable. Why? -
Our View: Local teens, scouts provide shining example of service
It’s often said--and with good reason--that young people are the future of America.
Well, enough young people exhibit good qualities like leadership and hard work ethics in the Grove City area today, that the future may end up brighter than you might think. -
Good service can make or break a business
I was appalled by the poor customer service at a local popular convenience store a few days ago.
There were multiple cash registers, but only two were open. One register was being worked by a young girl who was doing her best. Another cashier was not at her register; she was replacing a coffee filter a few steps away. The other cashier was working her tail off trying to accommodate the growing number of waiting customers.
As the coffee filter girl looked up, she let out a huge sigh of disgust. -
What makes America great
In less than 200 years, America grew from a handful of colonies to become the greatest nation in history. In a few hundred years, we surpassed nations that were many times older. But what makes America great?
The two main elements that make America great are its people and its freedoms.
Our people have a “can do,” “nothing is impossible” spirit. Starting with the American Revolution, we have always conquered adversity, often in the face of overwhelming odds. -
Obama must convince public he will cut debt
Clearly, there’s a need for the federal government to pivot from deficit spending to create jobs, to deficit reduction to contain the national debt. But when?
With the public debt due to reach 100 percent of gross domestic product next year -- and heading toward record levels -- Congress is making the pivot now, much to the distress of liberal economists and the Obama administration. -
New Yorkers moved to action by Mother Teresa snub
There is no room at the Empire State Building for Mother Teresa, the small nun whose lifelong and unmatched dedication to humanity resulted in her receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979.
A spokesman for the Empire State Building said that although the building has a tradition of lightings for religious holidays (Easter, Eid al Fitr, Hanukkah and Christmas) “our guidelines state clearly that we do not accommodate requests for religious figures or requests by religions and religious organizations.”
-
‘Thank you’ always sounds good - even when it’s not in a Southern drawl
Most people today - including myself, on numerous occasions - seem to have little time for common courtesy.
If you’ve watched TNT’s popular summertime show, “The Closer,” starring Kyra Sedgwick, you’ve seen one example of a dying breed. Kyra’s character, Deputy Chief Brenda Lee Johnson - you can tell just by her name that she’s a Southern lady (and I can hear her introducing herself in a drawl in my head just now) - gets criminals to confess using razor-sharp cunning with a sugary coating of Southern charm and courtesy.
One thing you commonly hear Deputy Chief Johnson drawl - often with a polite smile, no less - is “Thank you so much” (with a little drawn-out emphasis on “soooo”). - More Opinion Headlines
-
Your View: Letters to the Editor, July 24, 2010
